<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHMCS – Branded or Non Branded?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.licensecube.com/billing-systems/branded-whmcs-vs-unbranded.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.licensecube.com/billing-systems/branded-whmcs-vs-unbranded.html</link>
	<description>Learn about Hosting Licenses and News - LicenseCube Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob77</title>
		<link>https://blog.licensecube.com/billing-systems/branded-whmcs-vs-unbranded.html#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.licensecube.com/?p=1838#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Always preferred to spend some extra money and remove the WHMCS link coming with WHMCS license. Nothing against WHMCS but is not looking good and fitting the nice web design we have :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always preferred to spend some extra money and remove the WHMCS link coming with WHMCS license. Nothing against WHMCS but is not looking good and fitting the nice web design we have <img src='https://blog.licensecube.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
